Visitor:
Philosophy - Index > Testing - Index
New testimonies of conscientious objection to animal experiments

New testimonies of student conscientious objection to animal experiments in education and training, provided by Dr Lisa Elsner and Dr Anya Yushchenko, are now online on the InterNICHE website http://www.interniche.org .

Both now professional veterinarians, Dr Elsner (Australia) and Dr Yushchenko (Ukraine and Canada) describe their successful campaigns as students against harmful animal use and the strategies employed to implement progressive, humane alternative methods.

In particular, this included the alternative approach of working with animal patients instead of performing terminal animal labs for veterinary clinical skills and surgery training.

Read the new testimonies here:

http://www.interniche.org/conscientious/testimonies/lisa_elsner  http://www.interniche.org/conscientious/testimonies/anya_yushchenko 

They contribute to an existing collection of over 20 others, available at http://www.interniche.org/en/conscientious/testimonies .

Further testimonies from students and trainees from across the world are invited, in order to share more experiences of curricular transformation. Please contact InterNICHE Co-ordinator Nick Jukes at coordinator@interniche.org if you have a testimony to share.

The new testimonies are copied in full below:

Dr Lisa Elsner

Bachelor of Veterinary Science (2001-2005) Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, Australia

I wanted to be a vet from when I was very young, and always cared deeply for the welfare of non-human animals. I decided to do a veterinary degree with the purpose of improving their welfare, and entered the veterinary science course at Melbourne University as a mature age student, having done a number of different jobs after finishing high school, including working with horses.

The first and second years of the vet degree involved lots of dissections, using greyhounds which had been euthanised due to lack of performance on the racing track. I was absolutely disgusted at the complete lack of empathy and respect shown towards these dogs by staff and students. During anatomy classes my peers would joke about which part of the greyhound would taste the best on a barbeque and at times would throw pieces of muscles they had dissected from a greyhound at each other. It was at this early point in my course that I started to wonder whether there were humane alternatives available, but I had no idea where to look or who to turn to for assistance.

I started searching on the internet, particularly animal rights websites, hoping to find something. I stumbled across an interview with Andrew Knight on the Animal Liberation NSW website, and couldn�t believe there was another vet student also opposed to this kind of thing. I got in contact directly with Andrew, which led to the beginning of my campaign against harmful animal use at Melbourne University.

When I found out about the terminal surgery classes that I would be facing later in my degree, I was shocked that this was how students are taught to perform surgeries. I always thought that students would learn under the strict guidance of experienced veterinarians out in private practice and/or at shelters. I knew I had to do something � there was no way I was going to take part in those terminal surgery classes.

In 2002, we started putting together a submission for alternatives to harmful practical classes, which I was to hand in to the Dean of Veterinary Science. Andrew provided most of the papers to include in the submission. I also used the InterNICHE website and discussion list for information. I then put together a covering letter and attempted to get signatures from my peers to support this submission. I had 6 or 7 other vet students at that time who were willing to support me. I thought that wasn�t bad considering how narrow minded most of my peers were.

I handed my completed submission to the Dean. I was approached by the head of the surgery department not long afterwards and was told that the Dean had passed the submission on to him and it was unlikely that the Dean had even read it. I was not impressed! But I was also not surprised at the disinterest shown by what was and still is a very conservative university.

The head of surgery then set up and attended a meeting with the Dean, myself, and one other student who also did not want to take part in the terminal surgery classes. The Dean spent the whole time questioning my beliefs and patronising me. But he said that they should be able to organise some cadavers of dogs, that he said would have been euthanised for health reasons, for me to complete the surgical practical classes later on in the course.

Very soon after I had this meeting, the first surgical class, which was written in the practical book as a live surgery as it had been every year, was changed to a class only involving the use of cadavers. After students were informed of this, a student approached the front of the class one day at a lecture and announced that �someone� (that is, me) was trying to �ruin� the surgical course for everyone. He said that a petition was being passed around the room so that those opposed to an alternative could sign it. Sadly, virtually everyone signed the petition, including several who had previously supported me by signing my submission. Not long afterwards I began receiving some very unpleasant, and at times abusive emails, from a number of my peers including claims that I was �single-handedly trying to tarnish the reputation of the veterinary school�.

And so began the practical classes later in the third year. The first surgical class, where all students were indeed now using only cadavers, was to learn how to do a thoracotomy. The next week I arrived for my second surgical class, thankful that I myself would not be killing any animals in order to learn. But despite this I had to endure seeing students dragging petrified dogs in to the surgery area. This was to be the last time these dogs would ever see sunshine. I felt physically sick knowing that these innocent dogs were going to be killed later that morning. My practical partner and I received our cadaver while the other students had 1 live dog per group.

The surgery that was performed was a spay. I will never forget seeing students repeatedly attempting catheterisation on their dog despite the high level of stress that it caused them. The practical classes were disorganised and poorly supervised. I witnessed one of the groups, which included some friends of mine, struggling with their surgery. The student performing the surgery told another member of the group that their dog was bleeding. It was clear that they were extremely stressed by the situation and had absolutely no clue what to do. There were no staff members around to help. Finally a staff member appeared, and a member of the student group informed her that their dog was �bleeding out�.

I questioned the staff more than once as to where the dogs used for the labs were sourced from, only to be given a vague answer. Many of the dogs were kelpies or kelpie crosses. Considering the lack of information from staff regarding these dogs, and the breeds used, I believe they must have come from farms or backyard breeders. The university has a dog colony at the Werribee campus, where students undertake the final 2 years of the course. Dogs kept in this colony were kept in small concrete runs with no bedding provided. They had no mental stimulation and were surrounded by other dogs barking continuously.

At every class I had my beliefs questioned and I received puzzled looks from veterinary staff who just couldn�t understand why I didn�t want to take part in the terminal surgeries. I also began to be treated differently by certain members of staff, including the Dean, who would ignore me or be rude towards me.

But after the surgical classes had finished I questioned the head of surgery as to whether an alternative course would be incorporated in to the syllabus and he said �yes�. I was treated very badly during the remainder of my course, particularly towards the end, but finally I graduated.

After practising as a vet for a while I found out from a vet student that no alternative course was in place yet, so I began to focus again on getting alternatives implemented for students who would be following me. In 2008, through Animal Liberation Victoria, I got in touch with a journalist who was very interested in running a story on this topic. I told her my experiences and what alternatives I thought should be put in to place. The article came out in a major Melbourne newspaper, the Herald Sun. Although the editor removed many important elements, it was still great that it was published.

There was a huge response from the public to this article, which was fantastic. Many people wrote in online to express their views, many disgusted and outraged by what was happening at the university. I tried contacting the vet school more than once after the newspaper article, but predictably never got an answer, even from the head of surgery.

Later in 2008, a high profile radio presenter in Melbourne also ran a piece on the issue. The radio presenter wanted to interview me but I was ill at the time and so a representative from Animal Liberation Victoria stepped in for me. The other side was represented by the Dean of Veterinary Science at Melbourne University. The Dean, as expected, kept justifying the practices at the university and unfortunately the radio presenter, who was not informed about the topic, seemed to side with the Dean.

The campaign died down from 2009, but the news coverage had put things into motion and in more ways than I realised at the time. It was in 2011 that I finally got the answer I had waited for - from a chance encounter with a final year vet student at work. He told me that their entire year level was brought together for a meeting late in 2010, and members of staff proceeded to ask who would still like to take part in the terminal surgical classes. He said that most students wanted to continue them. Staff then announced to students that due to public pressure following the newspaper article they would have to cancel all future terminal surgical classes.

I contacted the university itself to ask for written confirmation about this change. The reply was as follows:

�You are correct, the Faculty does not use terminal surgeries in its veterinary teaching program and has developed a range of other options, including a partnership with an animal welfare organization, to ensure that our students receive optimal training in anaesthesia and surgery�.

I also requested written confirmation from the Animal Welfare officer at Melbourne University, who is a veterinarian. Her reply, in November 2011, stated:

�I've now received an informal verbal update from the surgery team, as follows:

"The EBC synthetic abdominal model has now been fully implemented and has replaced the use of 40 animals. This model utilises pig intestine sourced from an abattoir, which is glued and sutured into a model within a stuffed dog. Opsite film is placed over the synthetic layers representing skin, subcutaneous tissues and muscle. Students practice doing incisions and an intestinal anastamosis to resect a texta-marked intestinal lesion. The students have given very positive feedback regarding the design of this model both from an educational perspective (tissue handling and suturing/closure techniques) and from a Replacement perspective.

"Further to the above, a neutering clinic arrangement has now been set up in conjunction with external veterinary organisation, to enable students to learn to desex in clinical patients.

"Further examples of Replacement which have been implemented include the use of synthetic bones for learning and practising orthopaedic techniques (plating, screws etc). The use of the VirtualVetSurgery multimedia program further complements the surgery teaching through the provision of theory as well as videos of techniques.

"I think the team appears to have done a good job with this, with their implementation of the 3Rs. I hope this addresses your concerns.�

Other than the use of pig intestine, I�m very happy with what has been implemented. It is a far cry from what was being done while I was a vet student. I am relieved that all the stress and hard work has finally paid off! Most of all, I am pleased that no dogs will be subjected to the terminal surgery practicals any more and that no student will ever have to go through what I had to go through. Having said that, I would do it all again, as it resulted in major changes to the curriculum of the veterinary course.

A huge thank you goes to Dr Andrew Knight, who provided me with much needed moral support and guidance throughout much of my time in vet school.


Dr Anya Yushchenko

Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine; VSTEP

Kharkov Zoovet Academy, Kharkov, Ukraine (1997-2002); VSTEP, Ontario Veterinary College, Canada (2009)

My first experience with animal use in education happened during 1997 in my first year as a veterinary student at Kharkov Zoovet Academy in the Ukraine. Someone started a rumour that dogs were being killed for anatomy classes. I didn�t take it seriously. How could it be possible for a veterinary school to be killing dogs? Someone came to the classroom and said that they had seen a stray dog being electrocuted in the anatomy building. I remember that moment really well. I felt like I was struck by lightning. The earth drifted from my feet and I felt sick to my stomach. I had to leave the classroom and go outside.

Eventually, we got used to the killing of dogs. We were told that it is for a good purpose and that it was done humanely. Moreover, we felt it wasn�t up to us. We decided to not think about it.

The following year, I took some physiology classes. Physiology is a very exciting subject for me and the lectures reflected what I felt was a triumph of humane knowledge and cutting edge science. I was so interested that I was spending my nights reading physiology textbooks. A couple of weeks later, we were asked to catch forest frogs for the upcoming wet labs. It didn�t seem right. I didn�t capture any frogs, but other students did, so we had enough for the class.

During the first lab, the teacher showed us how to make a �musculo-skeletal model� for physiological experiments. She held a live frog in one hand and a pair of blunt scissors in another, then started cutting the head of the frog with her blunt scissors in front of us. There was no anaesthetic. I ran out of the door crying. I felt the pain of the frog and I felt like it was me being decapitated. I felt trapped and helpless.

My classmates felt bad for me, but thought I was too soft. I didn�t think I was being soft: I was feeling compassion and empathy for other sentient beings. And I rebelled. I told the teacher that I would not take part in any of the wet labs. She said that I�d have to drop of the program. I replied that I�d prove at the exam that I knew as much as anyone else. And I did. I got the highest score and, as a result, the teacher couldn't make me quit.

The year after, I learned about EuroNICHE (later InterNICHE). A very enthusiastic activist and National Contact for the organisation, Victoria Meshcheryakova, came to our school to talk about alternatives to animal use in education. I thought I was dreaming. It was clear that there were other people fighting against animal experiments and that there were other options. I learned about computer models, videos and simulators, and I got in touch with InterNICHE Co-ordinator Nick Jukes.

I became involved with InterNICHE in 1999 as National Contact, and my involvement continues today. Many seminars, conferences and an enormous amount of outreach have been done in the Ukraine and worldwide over the years by InterNICHE volunteers, students, supportive teachers, and Nick. At my university, the co-ordinators of the anatomy program started looking into ethically sourced cadavers for their courses, the physiology department got a generous donation of used computers for implementing computer simulations, and pharmacology and bacteriology professors showed interest in videos and models. Further change, including widespread replacement, has been achieved across the Ukraine by the new National Contact Dmitry Leporsky working with Nick and other colleagues.

In 2007 I moved to Canada and had to do some re-training to become a licensed veterinarian. I joined the Veterinary Skills Training and Enhancement Program (VSTEP) program at the Ontario Veterinary College (OVC) in 2009toacquire specific technical skills relating to anaesthesia, surgery, medicine, pathology, pharmacology and radiology. While most of the animals used in the program were involved in minimally invasive procedures, there were mandatory terminal surgeries on live animals for the anaesthesia and surgery lab. Fortunately, my long-term co-operation with InterNICHE prepared me for addressing this challenging situation and reaching a successful conclusion.

The spay procedure is routinely performed at private veterinary clinics and animal shelters all around the world and doesn�t require the death of the animals. However, at VSTEP, each participant was supposed to perform an ovario-hysterectomy (spay) on an intact female dog, at the end of which the dogs were euthanized. In 2009, 40 dogs were bought from pounds and breeders for teaching purposes.

A written request was submitted to a VSTEP official for permission to participate in an alternative program for the anaesthesia and surgery lab. The alternative program involves practising surgical skills on a cadaver and performing anaesthesia on the animals that are later recovered. Numerous scientific studies have been published that compare alternative and traditional methods of training and preparing students for clinical practice. The studies demonstrate that alternative programs can satisfy the moral concerns of students, while maintaining high standards in the quality of their education.

VSTEP declined the request, thereby violating the university�s Animal Use Guidance. OVC has successfully used an alternative program for veterinary students for many years, which is evidence that an effective alternative program was available and could have been used. A negotiation process was initiated in close cooperation with InterNICHE. I proposed a number of solutions:

1) Performing the surgery on an ethically sourced cadaver: According to the InterNICHE Policy, �ethically sourced' means that the animals are free-living and are not bred or killed to provide cadavers or tissue for the practical, nor that a market is created or supported for such acquisition. Examples of ethical sourcing include companion animals that have died naturally or in accidents, or have been euthanized for medical reasons.

2) Performing surgery on a humane society animal: Students practise surgery under supervision of experienced surgeons and acquire important surgical skills, with the animal shelter getting the procedures performed at minimal cost.

3) Performing surgery in real clinical settings: This can be one of the most successful educational approaches for veterinary students. Clinical practice from a veterinary program provides a diversity of situations that veterinarians will be exposed to after graduation and allows a better transition from the academic to �field� practice.

4) Using surgical models for the procedure: Numerous surgical alternatives are available and widely used for the training of human and veterinary surgeons. OVC itself had developed and implemented a basic surgical skills practice model called �DASIE�. More sophisticated mannekins are available for advanced surgical techniques.

Unfortunately the negotiation process with VSTEP was not successful, and legal advice was sought. The Toronto-based organization Lawyers for Animal Welfare (LAW) advised that in Ontario, the Human Rights Code requires that every service provides equal treatment without discrimination based on creed, accommodating all users unless doing so would place an undue hardship on the person accommodating, or on the organization. This information was forwarded to VSTEP officials and several days later the changes to a protocol were made. Permission was obtained to recover one dog after the surgical procedure. An 11 month old female beagle named Rainbow was successfully spayed and brought to a caring temporary home. After a month of training and adaptation she was transferred to a permanent home and family.

One year later, in 2010, the Animal Alliance of Canada, with support from InterNICHE, LAW, the media and animal rights activists, started a campaign to eliminate all live animal surgeries in OVC. CBC news broadcasted the �Story of Rainbow� on the national TV channel and the situation concerning terminal surgeries at OVC became public knowledge. Numerous people contacted the college to demonstrate their disapproval of the current practice of killing dogs in order to train veterinarians. Some people decided to withdraw their donations to the university based on the TV reportage.

The combination of all the efforts brought success. In August 2010, the school announced that henceforth all of the beagles used for the VSTEP program would be recovered post-operatively and adopted out. In September 2010, the OVC announced that they would work towards an alternative-based training system that would not only change the way veterinary students are taught, but help make harmful animal practice a thing of the past. The transition involved using training models, simulators, cadavers and closely supervised surgery on live animals that benefit from the procedures rather than being killed after surgery.

My experience in the Ukraine and now in Canada built my confidence and taught me many things. I learned a lot about the value of information and good strategy, including the importance of finding the right people and organisations with whom to work and form alliances. The case of VSTEP at OVC demonstrates the feasibility of implementing such alternative tools and approaches and the potential of student-based initiatives to catalyse change. I am very happy to have been part of successful campaigns that have helped transform veterinary education and training.


Nick Jukes InterNICHE Co-ordinator

98 Clarendon Park Road Leicester LE2 3AE England

tel: +44 116 210 9652 mobile: +44 7552 972 770 e-mail: coordinator@interniche.org
www.interniche.org

Fair Use Notice and Disclaimer
Send questions or comments about this web site to Ann Berlin, annxtberlin@gmail.com