Visitor:


Aug 2015

The Truth Is Out [email protected]
 
by Amigo Galinha

How does orthodox cancer therapy "save" half the women with breast cancer? Half the women don't have breast cancer in the first place.

"If you are a woman who has been diagnosed as 'early breast cancer'.. (..no evidence of metastasis..).. there is one simple scientific fact that you need to know: when a pathologist diagnoses a lesion as 'early breast cancer', more than half the time the pathologist is wrong - it is not actually breast cancer... What most women have is a tumour which, under a light microscope, looks like a tumour to a pathologist. Chances are that this tumour lacks the ability to metastasize.. which is the hallmark of a genuine cancer...

The world's first controlled clinical trial of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer was centralised in my department..Dr Leslie Blumenson and I... made a surprising discovery. More than half of the patients..had tumours..that were more like benign lesions.

Our discovery was highly unpopular with the medical profession. Doctors could never afford to admit the scientific truth because the standard treatment in those days was a radical mastectomy. Admitting the truth could lead to malpractice suits by women who had lost a breast because of an incorrect medical diagnosis. The furious doctors at the National Cancer Institute..took our highly successful breast cancer research programme away from us; ...they eventually succeeded in suppressing our findings and blocking new publications...

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are statistical twins. When the functions of these two sexual organs diminish, the cells often become abnormal and look like cancer cells...The Journal of the American Medical Association reported amazingly high survival rates...of untreated early prostate cancer which showed 7 out of 8 of the tumours were not cancers.

There is no reason for women to panic when they hear "cancer"; panic makes them easy victims". Dr Irwin D. Bross PhD, former Director of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, New York.

"My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to four times longer then untreated individuals. if one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all he will live longer and feel better...With every patient that...boosts his health to build up his natural resistance, there's a high chance that the body will find its own defence against the cancer..." Prof. Hardin B Jones - then America's leading cancer statistician - Dep't of Physics and physiology, Univ. of California.

The patient who is wrongly diagnosed and has no cancer, and is therefore more likely to survive the "therapy", is recorded as a "cancer cure" and is often paraded in the press and on television.

This encourages others, some of whom have genuine cancer, to go down the same road.

The patient with cancer and in a weak state is usually killed by the treatment and is recorded as having "died of cancer". Those who never had cancer in the first place are made far more likely to develop cancer in the future from the lethal effects of the surgery, drugs and radiation.

ORTHODOX "CANCER CURES" COME FROM THE WRONG DIAGNOSIS: EITHER THE PATIENT NEVER HAD CANCER IN THE FIRST PLACE OR STILL HAS IT AND HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED "CURED" AFTER FIVE YEARS. THOSE WHO DIE AFTER FIVE YEARS REMAIN IN THE "CURE STATISTICS - CURED AND DEAD.

The only way to successfully treat a cancer patient is to restore the patient's health.

The Cancer Business is the second largest money-spinner in the world: only its close relative, petrochemicals, is greater. As of the year 2000, the "Imperial Cancer Research Fund" and the "Cancer Research Campaign" have around 170 years of fund-raising between them. When they started, cancer was a rare disease: now around 40% - and rising - of the population have, or will develop cancer.

Well over £100,000,000 - and rising - per year is now being collected by the main cancer and leukaemia research fund-raisers.

The cancer research racket has three main facets: financing the development of highly lucrative treatments known to kill the patient up to four times faster than the disease does: ignoring, ridiculing or sabotaging safe, effective cancer therapies: protecting the industries, particularly the petro-pharmaceutical syndicate, who are responsible for the cancer epidemic.

"...still the money pours in for 'Cancer Research' from kind-hearted, well-meaning people in spite of the fact that the much-advertised 'cures' and 'discoveries' invariably turn out, year after year. to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble, the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides...

Surely there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so many animals...the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on demonstrably wrong lines." Morley Steyner 1940

In the 60 years since these words were written, (this article was written in 2000 - Amigo) orthodox cancer research is still on the same useless, but highly profitable path. The treatment has remained on precisely the same lines: attacking the tumour or the cancer cell with the scalpel/drugs/radiation and usually killing the patient in the process.

Anyone who has seen a friend or relative die this way - someone who may well have survived with safe, effective treatments - should remember that those responsible knew exactly what they were doing, having seen the same lethal procedures destroy hundreds, if not thousands, of patients before.

To smokescreen the total failure of the cancer and leukaemia research programes, periodic "breakthroughs" are announced by the cancer mafia and their on-the-payroll media lackeys. Any increase in survival times for cancer and leukaemia victims is entirely down to the cancer orthodoxy being finally forced to use less lethal treatments. The pseudo-scientists of the Leukaemia Research Fund were forced to admit "The intensive therapy give to children...can result in intellectual impairment, heart damage, growth disorders, and...second cancers." When a patient dies from the effects of the treatment more than five years after diagnosis they stay in the 5-year "cured" statistics: cured and dead.

People who are diagnosed as having cancer or leukaemia and who are, later, diagnosed cured, fall into one of three categories: those who still have cancer; those who have had their cancer defences restored by natural, holistic means; those who never had cancer or leukaemia in the first place. "I wouldn't be surprised if they are curing a lot of leukaemia that never existed" anonymous U.S. cancer statistician.

THE ONLY WAY TO SUCCESSFULLY TREAT ANY PATIENT WITH CANCER OR LEUKAEMIA IS TO RAISE; TO A HIGH LEVEL; THE HEALTH OF THE VICTIM.
This approach is of no interest whatsoever to the research organisations, fronting for the drugs industry and pretending to look for a drug to "cure cancer": a totally impossible concept.

"CANCER RESEARCH" THE FAILURE IS DELIBERATE

The "Imperial Cancer Research Fund" and the "Cancer Research Campaign" have over 170 years of fund-raising between them: they are now collecting over £100 million each year. When they started, cancer was a rare disease; now it is an out-of-control epidemic. 40% - and rising - of the population have or will develop cancer: by the year 2010 (art. written 2000 - ed) UK citizens will, probably, be more likely to develop cancer in their lifetime than they will be to avoid it.

The Cancer Business is second only, in size, to its close relative, the petrochemical industry.

The Business has always continued to grow by deliberately facing in the wrong direction.

" A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES, THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY. TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES...IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...

THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS, REGARDLESS OF ASCTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL." The Houston/Hull Analysis.

THE INFORMATION TO SUCCESSFULLY TREAT CANCER HAS BEEN IN FOR DECADES: ONE CLINIC, ALONE, HAS TREATED 100,000 PATIENTS OVER THE SPACE OF THIRTY YEARS.

To protect the industries which are responsible for the cancer epidemic and, thereby, ensuring that the disease continues to increase, with ever more millions pouring into the "research" coffers, The Imperial Cancer Research Fund issued a statement - "One of the biggest myths in recent years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused by exposure to radiation, pollution, pesticides and food additives."

In 1940, Morley Stainer wrote "...still, the money pours in for "Cancer Research" from kind-hearted, well-meaning people, in spite of the fact that the much-advertised cures" and "discoveries" invariably turn out, year after year, to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble; the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides...

Surely there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so many animals...the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on demonstrably wrong lines."

60 years, countless millions of pounds, animals and human victims later, the deliberate fraud continues at an ever increasing rate.

THE IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND THE CANCER RESEARCH CAMPAIGN THE LEUKAEMIA RESEARCH FUND THE YORKSHIRE CANCER RESEARCH CAMPAIGN TENOVUS CANCER RESEARCH CANCER AND LEUKAEMIA IN CHILDHOOD TRUST THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH THE WORLD CANCER RESEARCH FUND...all support vivisection.
Animal research GUARANTEES failure and the ever-lasting need for "more research".

In 1975 America's leading cancer statistician told The Cancer Business that their treatments were killing the patient up to four times faster than the disease did: nothing changed.

The organisations supporting and funding the development of the lethal treatments and those administering them know exactly what they are doing.
ANY RECENT INCREASE IN SURVIVAL TIMES ("CURES") IS ENTIRELY DOWN TO THE CANCER AND LEUKAEMIA SYNDICATE USING LESS LETHAL TREATMENTS; AND NOTHING ELSE.

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFICALLY VALID EVIDENCE THAT CHEMO AND RADIO "THERAPY" HAVE ANY VALUE, WHATSOEVER, IN INCREASING SURVIVAL RATES.


"Last week a woman in her 70s woke to find her pillow soaked in blood and immediately realised that she had bled from her mouth. Unfortunately, she started to vomit large quantities of blood and died..." Dr. Thomas Stuttaford - The Times.

The woman was yet another victim of "arthritis research": she had been taking a NSAID - non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug - developed through fraudulent research.

"The chance of sustaining a major gastro-intestinal complication from NSAID treatment starts almost immediately after swallowing the first pill..." Dr. Stuttaford.

Brand-name NSAIDS include - Brufen, Fenbid, Preservix, Fenopron, Progesic, Froben, Indomethacin, Orudis, Oruvail, Mobic, Relifex, Rheumox, Voltarol, Diclomax, Motifene, Misoprostol...all were passed to the patient after "safety tests" on animals.

In this research animals are subjected to prolonged damp and cold and have their joints crushed and destroyed by the injection of chemicals : all to produce potentially lethal but highly lucrative drugs.

Arthritis is a billion pound-plus- per year, industry in the UK alone : the ARC - Arthritis and Rheumatism Council - a front for the drugs industry, funds and promotes fraudulent research and supplies a constant stream of misinformation on the disease.

Not content with deception, they resort to outright lies in their literature to ensure that the drug regime is the preferred route for arthritis victims, rather than the safe, effective, non-patentable, non-drug way.

"...all forms of treatment that they (doctors and NHS therapists) use must be of proven value and safety." Lie : estimates vary from 50 percent to over 85 percent as to the amount of orthodox treatments which are, at best, useless or unproven.

As to safety - NSAIDS, kill 2000/4000 people, per year, in the UK alone and permanently damage at least another 10,000.

This is apart from all the other victims maimed and killed by "safety-tested" steroids and the rest.

On diet, the ARC state "Special diets rarely make a great deal of difference with arthritis". Lie : nutrition is, overwhelmingly, the most crucial factor in the incidence, severity and control of arthritis.

Other factors relevant to arthritis, such as vaccination, antibiotics, fluoride etc. are, naturally, never mentioned in ARC literature : the phony chemical/drug organisations never attack each other.

In its 60-plus years of fund-raising the ARC has been far worse than totally useless in the field of arthritis prevention or treatment.

Now, in the UK, 20 million - and rising - suffer some form of the disease and innumerable people have suffered the multitude of side-effects, death included, of the drug treatments produced by ARC-funding : treatments which are never necessary.

if you have arthritis, remember that the adoption of a diet which leans heavily on raw, vegan, organic foods and which excludes tea and coffee can make a huge difference; once the regime has begun to clear the backlog of intestinal debris which the ARC's "balanced diet" - animal junk foods included - has accumulated.

Herbal and homeopathic remedies and cider vinegar can also make a considerable difference : as can baths with Epsom salts - buy the commercial salts in bulk as these are cheaper.

Once the herbal/nutritional treatment is commenced you can begin the gradual reduction and possible elimination of the potentially-lethal drugs.

The ARC is also a member of the "Research for Health Charities Group" ; an organisation set up and funded by the petro-pharmaceutical/vivisection industry to spread false information about the relevance of animal research in safety testing.

Without fraudulent safety tests on animals, the drugs, vaccines, pesticides, industrial chemicals etc. would have to be subject to real safety tests : whilst this would mean safety for human beings, this would spell disaster for the profits of the drug/research interests which need fraudulent tests to market their wares.

REMEMBER - every one of the tens of millions of pounds down the phony "arthritis research" drain is an insult to the millions of humans and animals who have suffered and died.

Spreading the message depends on YOU.
ARC FREEPOST PO Box 177 CHESTERFIELD S41 7BR

ORGANIC SILICA is now available in this country. This safe, effective compound, OS5, has so upset the French arthritis industry that its discoverer was jailed and is now living in exile. Details from Pat Rattigan NEMESIS PO Box 73, CHESTERFIELD S41 OHH


Cancer Treatment - time for litigation

With increasing numbers of thinking cancer victims opting for self-help - usually after being told to go home and die - perhaps it is time for a more robust stance, by society, towards the cancer orthodoxy.

Recently, both a mother of a young leukaemia sufferer and a daughter of a middle-aged cancer victim have come to see me to ask what can be done. The child has had his bone marrow destroyed by class-6 super-poisonous "chemotherapy" and is unlikely to survive, whilst the man was "too ill for the treatment" : he has a chance.

There was nothing unusual about the visits except for the fact that they are becoming more common. Far more people are questioning The Medical Wisdom than when I first started, 25 years ago, to tell anyone who would listen that there was another way.

In 1980, Dr. B. A. Richards wrote a book "The Topic of Cancer" when the killing has to stop" : the killing referred to the treatment.

Five years earlier, Prof HB Jones, then America's leading cancer statistician, told the cancer industry that his statistics showed that untreated individuals survived up to four times longer than those treated.

These criticisms and many more had no discernible effect on the cancer gods : now, the cracks are beginning to widen, slowly.

However, I feel that it will take litigation - as in vaccine damage - before the immovable object of consensus medicine is seriously disturbed.

In Dr Richards book he talks of medical malpractice and, possibly, manslaughter as being appropriate terms to describe the "barbarity" of regular cancer treatment. At least two authorities on medical malpractice tell of "...improper or injurious medical or surgical treatment through carelessness, ignorance or intent..." and that "...a more serious criminal lack of care arising from deliberate disregard for the care and safety of other persons constitutes manslaughter."

Dr Richards asks "Could it not be criminal and, thus, manslaughter, if the patient dies of his treatment rather than of the disease." Viewed objectively, the answer must be yes - these people know what they are doing, but objectivity is rare where cancer therapy is concerned : due, I believe, to the sheer numbers of cancer cases - past, present and future. The crime is so large that it is unrecognisable as such ; and it has continued virtually unchanged or unchallenged for decades.

The Autumn 1997 of the Leukaemia Research News reported scientists views "The intensive therapy given to children to ensure their survival (!) ...can result in...intellectual impairment, heart damage, growth disorders...second cancers." When the patient dies more than 5 years after the treatment they remain in the "cure" statistics : cured and dead.

Unfortunately for the orthodox "cancer cure" myth-makers, at regular intervals some high profile personality develops genuine cancer.

The Shah of Persia, King Hussein of Jordan, Jackie Onassis, Senator Hubert Humphries, John Wayne, Bobby Moore, Marti Caine, Dusty Springfield, Roy Castle, Linda McCartney, George Harrison, John Thaw,...all had "the finest modern cancer treatment money can buy" and all ended up dead.

"Cancer Research" is now, world-wide, spending £13.5 billion each year, whilst the industrial world heads for a theoretical cancer incidence within decades. The causes of cancer are tolerated or actively encouraged ; and the safe, effective therapies are ignored, ridiculed, suppressed or sabotaged. One clinic, alone, has treated holistically, 100,000 patients over a 30 year period.

To smokescreen the ongoing failure of cancer research, regular "breakthroughs" are announced by the transparent "medical correspondents"/ "science editors" etc

Whilst Dr Bruce Halstead's enraged cal for "A Medical Edition of the Nuremberg Trials" may be somewhat ambitious, civil actions might be possible if the legal profession could be persuaded to adopt a high profile with regard to this neglected área of litigation. There are considerable potential benefits for cancer victims - past, present and future - their relatives and the lawyers.

Not for the first time, the legal profession must step in to fill the vacuum left by the medics, bureaucrats, politicians and the mass media.
Pat Rattigan N. D.

THE CANCER BUSINESS
second only to the petrochemical industry
36-page booklet
lethal treatments fraudulent research suppressed cures....protected carcinogens the orthodox cure hoax survival £1.75 post paid

NEMESIS PO BOX 73 CHESTERFIELD S41 OYZ
Tel 01246 2304754


Fair Use Notice and Disclaimer
Send questions or comments about this web site to Ann Berlin, [email protected]