Animal Cruelty and Domestic Violence
June 22, 2009 Making the Connection to Protect Animals and PeopleThis week Advocacy for Animals presents an article by Randall Lockwood, Ph.D. Dr. Lockwood is senior vice-president of Anti-cruelty Field Services at the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA). He writes here on domestic violence and the strong correlation between violence against humans and against animals in situations of domestic abuse.
Part of my daily routine is to review a summary of the previous day�s media stories reporting on instances of animal cruelty. Nearly every day there is an account of an incident in which a companion animal has been injured or killed in the context of a domestic dispute. Usually the perpetrator has been arrested and is facing serious charges that may include both animal cruelty and domestic violence. The following are some recent incidents:
Such arrests were
uncommon until relatively recently. If police responded to a domestic
incident and a dead animal was found at the scene, it was likely to be
discarded as if it were a broken piece of pottery. The fact that the human
victim of the violence had a deep attachment to the pet was often
unappreciated, as was the reality that the animal potentially provided key
evidence that could prove a violent crime.
Things have changed in
the last decade. Police, prosecutors and judges have become better educated
about the growing body of research showing a connection between animal
cruelty and interpersonal violence. This has included numerous studies
reporting a high incidence of abuse of animals by perpetrators of domestic
violence in order to control, intimidate, or emotionally abuse their
victims.
Pets are part of the
family in most homes with children: 74.8 percent of homes with children over
age 6 have pets. The woman is the primary caregiver in nearly three-fourths
of these households. Interviews with women seeking protection in domestic
violence shelters throughout the U.S. and Canada consistently show that
about 70 percent of them reported violence towards their animals. In more
than a third of these cases, children had witnessed this violence.
Harm or fear of harm to
pets is a common reason why women delay leaving or trying to leave a violent
relationship if they are unable to take their pets along or find a safe
place for them. More than a dozen studies show that between 25 and 40
percent of battered women worry about what will happen to their pets or even
family livestock should they leave. Many fear that, once they have left,
their pets could make easy targets for retaliation by their abuser.
Several recent trends
demonstrate a greater recognition of the need to respond to this problem:
Better training
for law enforcement
Every law enforcement
agency is required to provide training on recognizing and responding to
domestic violence. Much of this training now includes material on the animal
abuse in the context of such violence. Some agencies have changed their
General Orders on domestic responses. For example, the Baltimore Police
Department instructs its officers to �Remain alert for signs of abuse to any
family pets encountered during domestic situation calls for service and
document occurrences. Ensure that the animal shelter is notified when you
encounter abused family pets. (General Order G-11). Other agencies have
developed special units to facilitate cross-training and cross-reporting of
different forms of abuse. For example, the Broward County, Florida,
sheriff�s department has a Special Victims and Family Crimes Section that
combines investigations of child abuse, elder abuse, domestic violence and
animal cruelty.
Establishment of 'safe havens' for animal victims of domestic violence
![]()
Until recently,
pet-owning victims of domestic violence had few options if they needed to
escape from a violent relationship and feared what might happen to animals
that were left behind. In the last decade, many domestic violence shelters
have teamed up with humane societies, animal care and control agencies,
veterinarians and others to provide temporary shelter for animals in need.
According to the
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence�s 2004 National Directory of
Domestic Violence Programs, more than 700 shelters across the country
provide some assistance or referrals for placement of pets. However, very
few women�s shelters are equipped to provide shelter for both human and
animal victims of violence in the same location. American Humane�s Pets and
Women�s Shelters (PAWS) Program encourages the establishment of such
facilities, but there are still only a handful of such facilities.
Strengthening of
animal cruelty laws related to domestic violence
In 2004 Maine amended its
animal cruelty code to make it a separate crime to kill or torture an animal
to frighten or intimidate a person or to force a person to injure or kill an
animal. Indiana passed a law in 2007 that specifies that the definition of
�crime involving domestic or family violence� includes animal cruelty used
to threaten, intimidate, coerce, harass, or terrorize a family or household
member. The killing of an animal with the intent to threaten, intimidate,
coerce, harass, or terrorize a family or household member is a now a Class D
felony.
Extending orders
of protection to pets
In 2006 state legislators
began to recognize the need to provide victims of domestic violence
additional legal protection for the animals that are so important to them.
The courts already allow for orders that prevent abusers from coming near a
victim�s home, children, vehicle or workplace�but pets were rarely included
in such orders and in some states could not be included without a change in
the law. Maine enacted the nation�s first laws specifically allowing courts
to include companion animals in domestic violence protective orders. Vermont
and New York followed suit. Similar laws were quickly passed in California ,
Colorado , Connecticut , Illinois , Louisiana , Nevada , Tennessee ,
Washington , and Puerto Rico . Similar legislation has been introduced in
about a dozen other states in the last year. Several bills have failed, but
will be re-introduced.
Courts in most states are
free to extend this protection to pets without a state law, but having such
a law is a powerful tool for educating judges, prosecutors, victim advocates
and victims to the need to provide for such protection to protect people and
the animals they love.
Communities are realizing that
violence is violence, whether the victim is a child, a spouse, an elderly
person, or an animal. Addressing the needs of the often hidden animal
victims, and holding the perpetrators of violence accountable, can help all
the other family members.
To Learn More
How Can I Help?
11/05/2009 If the pets are abused, the children will be, too![]() When animals in a home are abused or neglected, it is a warning sign that others in the household may not be safe. In addition, children who witness animal abuse are three times more likely of becoming aggressive or abusive. (Currie, C.L., 2006,). -- Research quoted by Caren Kaplan, MSW, director of child protection reform for the American Humane Association, testifying today before the House Committee on Education and Labor's Subcommittee on Healthy Families and Communities. Kaplan was there to urge Congress to reauthorize and increase funding for the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA).
Kaplan's full
testimony, which includes a full description of CAPTA and its history as
well as a complete definition of Differential Response, can be
read here.
A review of Cheryl
L. Currie's paper, "Animal cruelty by children exposed to domestic
violence," can be found
here.
Currie is from the School of Public Health , Univ. of Alberta , Edmonton .
Fair Use Notice and Disclaimer
Send questions or comments about this web site to Ann Berlin, annxtberlin@gmail.com |