Full story:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201212/animal-cruelty-and-antisocial-behavior-very-strong-link
Eleonora Gullone's book shows strong evidence links different types of
abuse
Published on December 11, 2012 by
Marc Bekoff,
Ph.D. in
Animal Emotions
Eleonora Gullone's new book titled "Animal
Cruelty, Antisocial Behaviour, and Aggression: More Than a Link",
published as part of the
Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series, shows that there is strong
empirical evidence linking different types of abuse. For many readers of
Psychology Today who want to learn more about possible links between how
nonhuman animals (animals) are treated and how this relates to cruelty to
humans, this is an excellent book with which to begin.
"The Link"
Eleonora Gullone is Associate Professor in the Psychology Department at
Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. She brings a strong research
background to the topic of her book and this is highly valuable because it
allows her to analyze what we know and don't know about the relationship
between animal cruelty and antisocial behavior in general. She notes that
what is generally called "The Link" refers to the idea that "acts of
interpersonal violence are frequently preceded by, or co-occur with, acts of
cruelty to animals, 'red flag' markers that previously were ignored." (p.
ix)
Gullone's book is well-organized into ten chapters including "Historical
and Current Conceptualization of Animal Cruelty", "The Development of
Antisocial Behaviour", "Biological and Individual Difference Risk Factors",
"Environmental Risk Factors", and "Aetiological Accounts of Animal Cruelty".
In her last chapter she draws some general conclusions and highlights what
is needed in future research.
One area in which much more research is
needed concerns the development of animal cruelty behavior as there still is
no study that has looked at its normative development. We also need more
cross-cultural studies because "the conceptualization of animal cruelty as
deviant ... will have varying validity, depending on that culture's animal
treatment standards." (p. 131) We also need more research on animal cruelty
itself and it is essential to remove
the
property status of animals in legal systems. Currently, animals are
considered to be mere property, just like a couch, bicycle, or backpack.
Gullone argues that because animal cruelty is invariably and traditionally
trumped by, but strongly linked to, human cruelty, we need to make animal
cruelty more worthy of
moral concern
and a target of intervention so that we can learn more about the etiology of
human cruelty. Thus, "By positioning acts of animal abuse within the
continuum of other antisocial behaviours, rather than as isolated incidents
or acceptable
childhood
rites of passage, we can gain more progress not only in reducing animal
abuse but also in improving human safety and lowering tolerance levels for
all acts of aggression." (p. x) And, there is some movement in this
direction. Forty-seven of the fifty states in the U. S. A. have laws that
consider certain acts of animal cruelty as felonies. Animal cruelty is also
getting more attention in public media. The increasing attention is good
because as Gullone notes, "many crimes against humans may well have been
prevented had any animal cruelty incidents that preceded them been taken
seriously." (Pp. 135-136)
All in all, Gullone's convincing case that
there are strong empirical links among different types of abuse and
violence, including animal cruelty, must be taken seriously. She concludes
her book as follows: " ... laws should
punish
criminals according to the severity of the acts they perpetrate, without
discrimination or
favour based on the target species of the particular crime." (p. 139) On her
account, because of the well-established link among different types of abuse
and violence, both nonhuman and human animals will greatly benefit from
intervention.
As someone coming to this field with little knowledge but
with more than passing interest, I found this book to be well worth the
read. It really got me thinking about how important it is that nonhuman
animals be granted much more legal protection and how animal cruelty needs
to be taken much more seriously than it currently is. And by doing this,
both nonhuman and humans animals will greatly benefit. A win-win situation
for all.